Our nation is at its best when we embrace the promise and potential of our multiracial democracy, casting aside the false narratives that seek to divide and weaken us. Unfortunately, both here at home and abroad, autocratic tendencies have taken root, with leaders cynically exploiting people's fear and material suffering in order to aggregate dangerous levels of power. The moment we currently find ourselves in will require deep unity and resilience to see us through to a renewed and inclusive vision of America.

In this series for grantmakers of all geographies and strategies, we will learn from experts deeply engaged in the study and practice of resisting autocracy and building the systems and infrastructure necessary to defend democratic forms of governance. Together, we will explore threats to NGOs, philanthropy, and other civil society actors; draw on lessons learned around the globe from nations that have grappled with democratic backsliding; and hone in on how philanthropic resources can support local-level defense of communities and democratic norms. Across these conversations, we will also unpack how the scapegoating of immigrants, LGBTQ+, and other communities has divided populations, serving as a precursor to a broader-scale loss of rights.

Part III: Local Responses in the Protection of Democracy

In this final session of GCIR’s anti-authoritarian series, we will examine how front-line organizations and funders are responding in real time to increasingly oppressive state actions, including the militarization of Los Angeles and recent attempt to take over the nation’s capital, with the promise of more cities to be targeted.

These actions are not only designed to instill fear in communities and discourage dissent, but also represent a dangerous politicization of military force against the administration’s perceived political opponents and communities comprised primarily of residents of color. Considering the magnitude and volume of the threats to immigrants and other communities, funders must consider their responsibility and the role they can play in the response.

As we learned in part 2 of our series, the actions currently being taken are neither disconnected nor inconsequential but have instead portended democratic backsliding around the globe countless times–serving as a warning sign that our democracy is on the edge. Though these autocratic actions may be federal in their origin, the impacts are felt on the ground in local communities where philanthropy has the power and responsibility to respond.

Register